ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Classification of peripheral vitreoretinal interface lesions using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with guidance of ultrawide field imaging.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral retinal degenerations: multimodal imaging-guided risk stratification and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Fundus Photography with SS-OCT Images in Justifying Prophylactic Laser Photocoagulation of Peripheral Retinal Lesions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to classify peripheral vitreoretinal interface (VRI) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to compare these findings with those obtained by ultra-widefield (UWF) pseudocolor imaging. Method: Peripheral OCT images of VRI lesions were obtained using spectral domain OCT system with a steerable probe guided by UWF images. Two independent investigators categorized the OCT images into four groups based on the extent of vitreoretinal traction and the presence of retinal breaks. Differences in OCT-based categorization between the same lesion types visualized by UWF imaging were also compared. Results: Of the total 82 patients, 105 peripheral lesions were included in this study. The inter-observer agreement for the classification of UWF and OCT images demonstrated good consistency, with kappa values of 0.949 ± 0.025 and 0.836 ± 0.042, respectively. In the OCT classification of VRI lesions, 18 (17.1%) cases were category A, 28 (26.7%) cases were category B1, 30 (28.6%) cases were category B2, and 29 (27.6%) cases were category C. Of the 37 vitreoretinal tuft lesions, 32.4% were classified as category B2 and 16.2% as category C, according to peripheral OCT classification. Similarly, 37.8% of 40 snail track and lattice degeneration lesions were classified as category B2, and 16.2% as category C. Conclusion: The VRI lesions can demonstrate considerable variability when visualized with peripheral OCT among the same lesion types visualized through UWF imaging. Classification of peripheral OCT images may provide a more effective evaluation of the risk of lesion progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.