Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991700›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Development of a zoonotic influenza distribution assessment and ranking system (ZIDAR): Technical application in Nepal to support cross-sectoral risk-based surveillance.

Adam Charette-Castonguay, Dipendra Gautam, Binay Shrestha, Hemant Chandra Ojha, Barun Kumar Sharma, Mukul Upadhayaya, Sujan Rana, Roshika Shrestha, Lok Bandu Chaudhary, Bhawana Kandel and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Adam Charette-CastonguayQueensland Alliance for One Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Dipendra GautamWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Binay ShresthaWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hemant Chandra OjhaDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Barun Kumar SharmaDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mukul UpadhayayaDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sujan RanaDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Roshika ShresthaDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lok Bandu ChaudharyDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bhawana KandelDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rudra Prasad MarasiniDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sharmila ChapagainDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tulsi Ram GompoDepartment of Livestock Services, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Surendra KarkiFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Nepal.
Apsara PoudelForest Research and Training Centre, Ministry of Forest and Environment, Nepal.
Saugat ShresthaWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Avinash Sunny KayasthaWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Arun Kumar GovindakarnavarWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Reuben SamuelWHO Health Emergencies Department, WHO South-East Asian Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Allison GocotanoWHO Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pushpa Ranjan WijesingheWHO Health Emergencies Department, WHO South-East Asian Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Nilesh BuddhaWHO Health Emergencies Department, WHO South-East Asian Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Edwin Ceniza SalvadorWHO Health Emergencies Department, WHO South-East Asian Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Manish KakkarWHO Health Emergencies Department, WHO South-East Asian Regional Office, New Delhi, India.
Ricardo J Soares MagalhãesQueensland Alliance for One Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS H23 IP000938World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonotic influenza poses a significant public health concern to agricultural industries, food security, wildlife conservation, and human health. Nations situated along migratory bird flyways and characterised by dense populations of livestock and humans, and low biosecurity of production animal value chains are particularly vulnerable to zoonotic influenza outbreaks. While spatial risk assessments have been used to map vulnerable areas, their applicability across multiple sectors has been so far limited. Here, we introduce the development and application of a Zoonotic Influenza Distribution and Ranking (ZIDAR) framework to identify areas highly suitable for zoonotic influenza transmission across multiple exposure interfaces and to measure the importance of associated risk factors. The development of ZIDAR involves a seven-step approach distributed across an initial expert consultation stage followed by a technical modelling stage. The expert consultation stage aims to define interfaces of exposure across human, livestock and wildlife, identification of associated risk factors for each of the identified interfaces and a prioritisation activity to define weights for the interfaces and associated risk factors. This is then followed by a technical phase involving model building, model structure validation, data gathering and assessment of model performance. The model development and performance assessment steps of the technical stage includes a model calibration step to maximise model fitness with regards to wildlife and animal interfaces by finding pareto-efficient sets of weights for risk factors. We applied the ZIDAR framework in Nepal and the resulting model structure enabled the identification of hotspot areas where the risk of transmission is more significant across multiple interfaces simultaneously. The ZIDAR Nepal model's predictive accuracy, determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, demonstrated strong performance: 0.87 and 0.85 for the wildlife and animal components, respectively. The ZIDAR framework presented here provides valuable insights to enable the formulation of comprehensive One Health surveillance programs and inform targeted and effective interventions to bolster pandemic preparedness strategies.

Indexed as

Decision-supportInfluenzaMappingModellingZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID39991700
PMCPMC11847460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.