ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
New classification of gastric polyps: An in-depth analysis and critical evaluation.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomic-size determinants drive therapeutic decisions in inflammatory fibroid polyps: a retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, more and more gastric polyps (GPs) are being detected. Traditional management strategies often rely on histopathologic examination, which can be time-consuming and may not guide immediate clinical decisions. This paper aims to introduce a novel classification system for GPs based on their potential risk of malignant transformation, categorizing them as "good", "bad", and "ugly". A review of the literature and clinical case analysis were conducted to explore the clinical implications, management strategies, and the system's application in endoscopic practice. Good polyps, mainly including fundic gland polyps and inflammatory fibrous polyps, have a low risk of malignancy and typically require minimal or no intervention. Bad polyps, mainly including hyperplastic polyps and adenomas, pose an intermediate risk of malignancy, necessitating closer monitoring or removal. Ugly polyps, mainly including type 3 neuroendocrine tumors and early gastric cancer, indicate a high potential for malignancy and require urgent and comprehensive treatment. The new classification system provides a simplified and practical framework for diagnosing and managing GPs, improving diagnostic accuracy, guiding individualized treatment, and promoting advancements in endoscopic techniques. Despite some challenges, such as the risk of misclassification due to similar endoscopic appearances, this system is essential for the standardized management of GPs. It also lays the foundation for future research into biomarkers and the development of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.