ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
The development and validation of a prediction model for post-AKI outcomes of pediatric inpatients.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of pediatric urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience from Jordan.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Characteristics and outcomes in severe and critically ill children with first wave SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in Northeast China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized children. A post-AKI outcomes prediction model is important for the early detection of important clinical outcomes associated with AKI so that early management of pediatric AKI patients can be initiated. Methods: Three retrospective cohorts were set up based on two pediatric hospitals in China, in which 8205 children suffered AKI during hospitalization. Two clinical outcomes were evaluated, i.e. hospital mortality and dialysis within 28 days after AKI occurrence. A Genetic Algorithm was used for feature selection, and a Random Forest model was built to predict clinical outcomes. Subsequently, a temporal validation set and an external validation set were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. Finally, the stratification ability of the prediction model for the risk of mortality was compared with a commonly used mortality risk score, the pediatric critical illness score (PCIS). Results: The prediction model performed well for the prediction of hospital mortality with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.854 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.816-0.888], and the AUROC was >0.850 for both temporal and external validation. For the prediction of dialysis, the AUROC was 0.889 (95% CI 0.871-0.906). In addition, the AUROC of the prediction model for hospital mortality was superior to that of PCIS ( Conclusions: The new proposed post-AKI outcomes prediction model shows potential applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.