Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991643›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2025

Home Cardiotocography in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Retrospective Study on Feasibility and Patient Well-Being.

Małgorzata Olesiak-Andryszczak, Jakub Pytlos, Anna Suchecka-Marut, Małgorzata Świdzińska, Marzena Mazurek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Małgorzata Olesiak-AndryszczakRegional Specialist Hospital in Wrocław, Research and Development Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Jakub PytlosWolski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-0391
Anna Suchecka-MarutRegional Specialist Hospital in Wrocław, Research and Development Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Małgorzata ŚwidzińskaRegional Specialist Hospital in Wrocław, Research and Development Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Marzena MazurekMyClinic, Out-patient Private Clinic, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Around 15% of pregnancies develop complications requiring detailed monitoring. With technological advancements, home cardiotocography has emerged as a potential alternative to the conventional approach, aiming to alleviate the stress and logistical challenges associated with in-clinic care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of a portable device to collect data for accurate interpretation of the examination and to evaluate patient satisfaction, along with physical and emotional comfort during the monitoring process. Methods: This retrospective study included 32 women with high-risk pregnancies, who independently performed 581 examinations utilizing the portable cardiotocography device Pregnabit Pro (Nestmedic, Poland). Moreover, participants were asked to provide feedback on their experiences through a comprehensive survey. Results: In total, 95.7% of examinations successfully captured all necessary diagnostic data. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate, recognizing the potential of the home-based approach to improve their overall pregnancy experience. A preference for home-based testing over in-clinic visits was consistently noted among patients. Discussion: This study shows evidence that home cardiotocography is a feasible and patient-preferred method for monitoring high-risk pregnancies. Our findings underline the importance of technological integration in prenatal care, advocating for a shift toward more patient-centered, accessible, and potentially cost-effective health care solutions.

Indexed as

cardiotocographyhigh-risk pregnancyhome-CTGpatient-centered carepregnancy complicationstele-CTGtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39991643
PMCPMC11839534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.