ArticleTelemedicine reports2025
Home Cardiotocography in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Retrospective Study on Feasibility and Patient Well-Being.
Article in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remote home cardiotocography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Around 15% of pregnancies develop complications requiring detailed monitoring. With technological advancements, home cardiotocography has emerged as a potential alternative to the conventional approach, aiming to alleviate the stress and logistical challenges associated with in-clinic care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of a portable device to collect data for accurate interpretation of the examination and to evaluate patient satisfaction, along with physical and emotional comfort during the monitoring process. Methods: This retrospective study included 32 women with high-risk pregnancies, who independently performed 581 examinations utilizing the portable cardiotocography device Pregnabit Pro (Nestmedic, Poland). Moreover, participants were asked to provide feedback on their experiences through a comprehensive survey. Results: In total, 95.7% of examinations successfully captured all necessary diagnostic data. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate, recognizing the potential of the home-based approach to improve their overall pregnancy experience. A preference for home-based testing over in-clinic visits was consistently noted among patients. Discussion: This study shows evidence that home cardiotocography is a feasible and patient-preferred method for monitoring high-risk pregnancies. Our findings underline the importance of technological integration in prenatal care, advocating for a shift toward more patient-centered, accessible, and potentially cost-effective health care solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.