Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991640›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2025

Patient Satisfaction with Remote Pre-Anesthesia Assessment Via Telephone.

Armin Langauer, Gernot Gerger, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Nikolaus Graf, Aylin Bilir, David M Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armin LangauerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Medical University of Vienna, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3313-3631
Gernot GergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine Völkl-KernstockLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Maria Kletecka-PulkerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Nikolaus GrafDepartment of Anaesthesia, Medical University of Vienna, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Aylin BilirDepartment of Anaesthesia, Medical University of Vienna, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
David M BaronDepartment of Anaesthesia, Medical University of Vienna, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of telemedicine can contribute to patient satisfaction, support hygienic concepts by avoiding physical contact when not required, and reduce waiting and travel time. We aimed to evaluate our recently implemented telemedical approach of remote pre-anesthesia assessment. Methods: We designed a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with remote pre-anesthesia assessment procedures, completeness of understanding, and technical feasibility. In total, 250 patients were asked to voluntarily complete the questionnaire after their pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Digital anesthesia records were subsequently reviewed for unexpected events and complications to investigate the quality and safety of the approach. Results: Patients included in our study were 51 years old (median, range 18-85 years), mostly female (58%) and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3 (22.8%, 56.4%, and 20.8%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high with ratings of "very good" or "good" in over 90% of all questions related to the pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone. Patient's evaluation for the use of telemedicine in general also showed a wide acceptance with 84.4% rating the idea as "very good" (55.6%) or "good" (28.8%). Duration of patient-physician interaction positively correlated with age ( Conclusion: Remote pre-anesthesia assessment via telephone is safe, technically feasible, and satisfactorily accepted in selected patients. These results encourage the continuing implementation of telemedical approaches for pre-anesthesia assessment.

Indexed as

patient safetypatient satisfactionpre-anaesthesia assessmenttelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39991640
PMCPMC11839509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.