ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
Intramedullary Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Outcomes Study.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Biomechanical Analysis of Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation and Dorsal Plate and Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Base Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
- Intramedullary Headless Screw Feasibility for Anatomical Reduction in II-V Metacarpal Fractures: A CT-Based Morphometric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intramedullary headless compression screw fixation for metacarpal fractures: a retrospective clinical and radiological study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Comparison of Plate Versus Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Extra-Articular Metacarpal Base Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Sufficient stability using retrograde cannulated screws in a metacarpal fracture model: a biomechanical evaluation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intramedullary fixation (IMF) has emerged as an effective treatment for metacarpal fractures. Benefits include stable fixation that allows early postoperative rehabilitation and high fracture union rates, without increased complications. Both headless compression screws and intramedullary threaded noncompressive nails have been described for this purpose; however, prospective outcomes reporting are lacking. This study assessed the outcomes of metacarpal fractures treated with IMF including patient-reported outcomes, grip strength, total active motion, and complications. Methods: A prospective multicenter trial enrolled consecutive patients with closed, extra-articular metacarpal fractures treated with IMF. Radiographic healing was assessed at each postoperative visit and patient-reported outcomes included pain scores, Results: One-hundred-one fractures were treated in 82 patients with an average age of 33 years and mean follow-up of 69 days. Most patients were male (70%), nonlaborers (72%), and nonsmokers (74%). Conclusions: Intramedullary fixation is a reliable technique for treatment of extra-articular metacarpal fractures with satisfactory patient-reported outcomes, excellent strength and motion, and a low complication rate. Intramedullary fixation should be considered for closed, extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.