Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991616›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025

Intramedullary Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Outcomes Study.

Michael B Gehring, Brandon Wolfe, Riley Kahan, Stephanie D Malliaris, Kia M Washington, Matthew D Folchert, Kyros Ipaktchi, Mark A Greyson, Alexander Lauder, Matthew L Iorio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael B GehringDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Brandon WolfeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Riley KahanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Stephanie D MalliarisDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Kia M WashingtonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Matthew D FolchertDepartment of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Kyros IpaktchiDepartment of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Mark A GreysonDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.
Alexander LauderDepartment of Orthopedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Matthew L IorioDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Intramedullary fixation (IMF) has emerged as an effective treatment for metacarpal fractures. Benefits include stable fixation that allows early postoperative rehabilitation and high fracture union rates, without increased complications. Both headless compression screws and intramedullary threaded noncompressive nails have been described for this purpose; however, prospective outcomes reporting are lacking. This study assessed the outcomes of metacarpal fractures treated with IMF including patient-reported outcomes, grip strength, total active motion, and complications. Methods: A prospective multicenter trial enrolled consecutive patients with closed, extra-articular metacarpal fractures treated with IMF. Radiographic healing was assessed at each postoperative visit and patient-reported outcomes included pain scores, Results: One-hundred-one fractures were treated in 82 patients with an average age of 33 years and mean follow-up of 69 days. Most patients were male (70%), nonlaborers (72%), and nonsmokers (74%). Conclusions: Intramedullary fixation is a reliable technique for treatment of extra-articular metacarpal fractures with satisfactory patient-reported outcomes, excellent strength and motion, and a low complication rate. Intramedullary fixation should be considered for closed, extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Indexed as

Intramedullary fixationMetacarpal fracturesPatient-reported outcomesThreaded noncompressive nails

Identifiers

PMID39991616
PMCPMC11846569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.