ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
The Impact of Social Media for Hand Surgeons: A Prevalence and Correlation Study With Online and Academic Reputations.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Social Media for Adult Reconstruction Surgeons: A Prevalence Study With Online and Academic Reputations.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Examining the Relationship Between Academic Excellence and Clinical Productivity in Orthopedic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Social Media and Wellness: Evolving Trends in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Representation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Social media use among cardiothoracic surgeons: The online landscape and comparisons between subgroups.JTCVS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines the influence of social media use among orthopedic and plastic-trained hand surgeons on patient-reported ratings online and academic productivity. Methods: The American Society of Surgery of the Hand directory was queried for actively practicing orthopedic and plastic surgeons with a hand surgery fellowship. Each name was searched on various social media platforms. Average ratings, number of reviews, and number of comments were collected from Healthgrades, Google reviews, and Vitals. H-index was searched on Scopus. A summated social media presence score was calculated to identify the top 20% of social media users in each cohort. Results: A total of 97 orthopedic and 102 plastic surgeons were included. Overall, plastic surgeons were more active on social media compared to orthopedic surgeons. There was a positive association between having active profiles and Healthgrades ratings. When looking within the subgroups, the top 20% of social media orthopedic users were found to have a significantly higher mean Healthgrades rating and a mean number of comments than the rest of the cohort. On Vitals, the top 20% of social media users had higher mean ratings compared to the remaining 80%. The top 20% of plastics social media users had a significantly higher average Healthgrades rating compared to the rest of the plastics group. On Google reviews, the top 20% also had higher mean ratings, as well as mean number of ratings, compared to the rest of the cohort. Plastic surgeons with a Twitter/X account had a significantly higher h-index than plastic surgeons without a Twitter/X account (14.5 vs 9.2, Conclusions: Social media involvement is positively associated with surgeon ratings and the number of reviews and comments on physician rating websites. Using web-based marketing tools is still rare in hand surgery, especially among orthopedic surgeons. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/decision analysis IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.