Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991594›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization2025

A Novel System for Markerless Intra-Operative Bone and Bone Fragment Tracking.

Marcus Tatum, Andrew Kern, Jessica E Goetz, Geb Thomas, Donald D Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcus TatumDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa.
Andrew KernDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa.
Jessica E GoetzDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa.
Geb ThomasDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa.
Donald D AndersonDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa.

Funding

Tissue and Experimental Modeling CoreP50AR055533 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GOETZ, JESSICA E · 2007 to 2016
$14.9M
Quantifying Fracture Severity Using a 3-D Puzzle Solving ApproachR21AR054015 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ANDERSON, DONALD D · 2008 to 2009
$359k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS028778NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR055533NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR054015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoroscopic guidance is an integral tool in modern orthopedic surgery often used to track bones and/or bone fragments during a surgical procedure. However, relying upon this intra-operative 2D projective imaging modality for this purpose can challenge a surgeon's ability to interpret 3D position and orientation of any but the simplest bony anatomy. A number of object-tracking technologies have been developed to aid surgeons, but they have failed to be generalizable to a wider array of procedures, have required an unrealistic amount of time and effort to implement, or have unacceptably changed the flow of the surgery. This work describes a novel, general-purpose system for markerless, intra-operative bone tracking that seamlessly integrates into a surgical setting. The system uses a unique calibration object placed next to the patient, which provides a common reference for aligning multiple fluoroscopic images. This approach enables robust and expedient 3D object registration from only two semi-orthogonal 2D fluoroscopic images.

Indexed as

3D-2D registration3D/2D registrationIntra-operative navigationMarkerless registrationOrthopedics

Identifiers

PMID39991594
PMCPMC11845215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.