ArticleiScience2025
Machine learning algorithms can predict emotional valence across ungulate vocalizations.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Humans correctly assign emotional valence of rat vocalizations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Species-independent analysis and identification of emotional animal vocalizations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vocalizations can vary as a function of their context of production and provide an immediate measure of an animal's affective states. If vocal expression of emotions has been conserved throughout evolution, direct between-species comparisons using the same set of acoustic indicators should be possible. The present study used a machine learning algorithm (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost]) to distinguish between contact calls indicating positive (pleasant) and negative (unpleasant) emotional valence, produced in various contexts by seven species of ungulates. With an accuracy of 89.49% (balanced accuracy: 83.90%), we found that the most important predictors of emotional valence were acoustic variables reflecting changes in duration, energy quartiles, fundamental frequency, and amplitude modulation. This approach is critical in the field of emotional communication, where more information is needed to reach a better understanding of the emotional origins of human language. In addition, these results can help toward the development of automated tools for animal well-being monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.