ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Use of augmented reality surgical navigation reduces intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging in anterior total hip arthroplasty with equivalent accuracy for component positioning.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Reality Navigation in Perpendicular Plate of Ethmoid Bone Resection: A Teaching Practice.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Augmented Reality in Navigated Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Accuracy and System Performance.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-assisted surgical navigation was designed to reduce the rates of acetabular component malpositioning, a common cause for revision following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared intraoperative measures such as radiation exposure, radiographic acetabular cup placement, and outcomes of patients who underwent a THA using computer-assisted surgical navigation with augmented reality (AR) compared to those who underwent traditional manual THA with fluoroscopic assistance (FA). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 115 hips who underwent primary direct anterior THAs using the intraoperative AR surgical navigation system between 3/30/2021 and 12/30/2022. These were compared to a matched cohort of 115 primary THAs performed with FA through a direct anterior approach during the same time period. Patients were matched based on age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), and BMI. Goal inclination and anteversion were set to 42° (°) and 22°, respectively. Results: THA with AR patients had decreased intraoperative radiation exposure (mean 2.0 versus 3.2 mGy, p < 0.001) and radiation time (mean 0.2 versus 0.4 min, p < 0.001). Deviation from the preoperative plan was similar between AR and FA for both radiographic inclination and anteversion. There was no difference in the operative time, estimated blood loss, or reoperations, all of which were for infection (1.7 versus 0.0 %, p = 0.5). Conclusion: AR surgical navigation in primary THA has similar radiographic, operative and clinical results as THA with intraoperative FA. However, AR surgical navigation is associated with decreased intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation and time. Further research is needed to evaluate accuracy of acetabular component positioning and complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.