ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Comparative hemodynamic responses to upright and recumbent cycling in patients with exercise intolerance.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Repeatability of heart-rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity as metrics of cardiac autonomic function during exercise in young females and males.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the influence of body position on cardiovascular responses during exercise is crucial for precise diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, particularly in patients with exercise intolerance. Aim: This study aims to compare the hemodynamic responses to exercise in upright and recumbent cycling positions in patients with exercise intolerance. Methods: A cross-over study design was employed, enrolling 21 patients for right heart catheterization during exercise in both upright and recumbent positions. Hemodynamic variables were measured at rest and across various exercise intensities. Results: Significant differences were observed in right atrial pressure (RAP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) between upright and recumbent positions. Upright exercise revealed lower values of RAP, mPAP, and PAWP, indicating distinct hemodynamic profiles. Conclusion: Body position significantly affects cardiovascular dynamics during exercise, providing valuable insights for diagnosing and managing exercise intolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.