Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991467›Full record

SynthesisExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2025

Elacestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a post-hoc analysis.

Azza Sarfraz, Muzna Sarfraz, Faheem Javad, Musfira Khalid, Bushra Shah, Amna Gul, Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani, Areeba Ismail, Khadija Cheema

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Azza SarfrazDepartment of Pediatrics, The Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-5745
Muzna SarfrazDepartment of Research, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-5740
Faheem JavadDepartment of Research, Al Nafees Medical College, Islamabad 45600, Pakistan.
Musfira KhalidDepartment of Research, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Bushra ShahDepartment of Research, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Amna GulDepartment of Research, Liaquat National Medical College and Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6414-6264
Mohammad Arfat GaniyaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-0117
Areeba IsmailDepartment of Research, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
Khadija CheemaDepartment of Medicine, Tucson Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7901-1336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality in women. Hormone therapy plays a crucial role in treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Elacestrant is a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that has shown promise in early-phase clinical trials. This post-hoc analysis systematically evaluates elacestrant's effectiveness in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, providing insights into its efficacy, safety, and potential advantages over existing treatments. Methods: We adhered to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines and systematically searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and Embase. We conducted the post-hoc analysis using R software (V 4.3.3), applying the inverse variance method and the DerSimonian-Laird estimator to pool effect estimates with a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran's Q test and the Results: Our post-hoc analysis encompassed 3 clinical trials and a total of 835 participants. The mean age of all 835 participants across the three trials was 59.5 years (95% CI: 58.7-60.3). The pooled progression-free survival (PFS)-was estimated at 4.38 (95% CI: -7.58-16.35, Discussion: Elacestrant shows promise for improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, but further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness. Future studies should include larger sample sizes, comprehensive phase II and III trials, and investigation of elacestrant in combination with other drugs or in preoperative settings.

Indexed as

antineoplastic agentsbreast cancerElacestranthormone receptor-positiveselective estrogen receptor degraders

Identifiers

PMID39991467
PMCPMC11847623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.