Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Construction of a prediction and visualization system for cognitive impairment in elderly COPD patients based on self-assigning feature weights and residual evolution model.

Wenwen Cheng, Chen Yu, Xiaohui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenwen Cheng *Military Preventive Medicine School, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Chen Yu *Military Preventive Medicine School, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaohui LiuThe 986th Hospital of PLAAF, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assessing cognitive function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is crucial for ensuring treatment efficacy and avoiding moderate cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. We aimed to build better machine learning models and provide useful tools to provide better guidance and assistance for COPD patients' treatment and care. Methods: A total of 863 COPD patients from a local general hospital were collected and screened, and they were separated into two groups: cognitive impairment (356 patients) and cognitively normal (507 patients). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to test cognitive function. The swarm intelligence optimization algorithm (SIOA) was used to direct feature weighting and hyperparameter optimization, which were considered simultaneous activities. A self-assigning feature weights and residual evolution (SAFWRE) algorithm was built on the concept of linear and nonlinear information fusion. Results: The best method in SIOA was the circle search algorithm. On the training set, SAFWRE's ROC-AUC was 0.9727, and its PR-AUC was 0.9663; on the test set, SAFWRE's receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.9243, and its precision recall-area under curve (PR-AUC) was 0.9059, and its performance was much superior than that of the control technique. In terms of external data, the classification and prediction performance of various models are comprehensively evaluated. SAFWRE has the most excellent classification performance, with ROC-AUC of 0.8865 and pr-auc of 0.8299. Conclusion: This work develops a practical visualization system based on these weight attributes which has strong application importance and promotion value.

Indexed as

AIchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasemild cognitive impairmentMLMontreal

Identifiers

PMID39991464
PMCPMC11842389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.