ArticleCureus2025
Real-World Data of Esophageal Malignancies Managed Under the Government Scheme From a Tertiary Cancer Center in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer is a major problem in India. The incidence has a geographic variation, being more common in some parts of south India and pockets in the north. The patients usually present in late stages as the symptoms are non-specific, hence patients are treated for other causes over prolonged periods. There has been marked improvement due to the incorporation of a multi-modality approach in the management of these cancers over the last decade.
objectiveThis study included patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer who presented to the department of medical oncology between January 2020 and December 2023. The aim was to analyze the clinical and demographic profiles and survival outcomes of patients. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer care center in southern India, primarily serving patients from rural areas. Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee was secured prior to the study (GSLMC/RC:1259A-EC/1259A-05/2024). Case files for all esophageal cancer patients treated at our center between January 2020 and December 2023 were collected from the medical records department and analyzed. We focused on patients diagnosed with non-metastatic esophageal cancer who had received treatment.
resultsA total of 47 patients participated in our study, with a mean age of 55 years. The male-to-female ratio was 2:3. Among the participants, 18 (38.3%) were smokers and 12 (25.5%) were alcohol users. The most frequently affected site was the middle thoracic esophagus, with 22 patients (46.8%), followed by the lower third in 15 patients (31.9%), and both the upper one-third and gastroesophageal junction cancers each accounting for five patients (10.6%). Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant histological type, representing 82% of cases. Stage 2 was the most common stage at presentation, seen in 22 patients (46.8%), followed by stage 3 in 17 patients (36.2%). Twenty patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), with 13 (65%) receiving a weekly regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin, while seven (35%) were treated with a CAPEOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) regimen alongside radiation (41.4 to 45 Gray). Of these, only eight patients (40%) proceeded to surgery, while 12 patients (60%) did not. Among those who underwent surgery, five patients (62.5%) achieved a pathological complete response. Additionally, 24 patients received definitive CRT, resulting in a complete response in 14 patients (58.3%) and a partial response in 10 patients (41.6%). Three patients defaulted on treatment. The median overall survival for the analyzed group was 10.5 months, with a subset analysis showing that those who had surgery had a survival duration of 12 months, compared to eight months for those who did not undergo surgery.
conclusionThe study concluded that the middle thoracic esophagus is the most prevalent site for esophageal cancer, with squamous cell carcinoma being the predominant histological type. Stage 2 is frequently observed at presentation, followed by stage 3. The standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal malignancies now involves a combined approach with NACRT. Despite advancements in multimodal treatments, the prognosis for esophageal cancer remains poor and requires significant improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.