ArticleCureus2025
Descriptive Analysis of Inpatient Pharmacist Interventions at a Tertiary Care Military Hospital in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Medication errors can be categorized into five main categories: prescribing, compounding, dispensing, distribution, and administration. Prescribing errors, including wrong indication, dose, frequency, and route of administration, are the most prevalent preventable medication errors. Over the past decades, pharmacists' role in minimizing such errors has grown with the development of pharmaceutical care. Thus, emphasizing pharmacists' interventions regarding prescribed medications is essential. Aims This study evaluated the frequency and types of medication errors addressed by in-patient pharmacists, as well as the acceptance of these interventions by physicians at King Fahd Military Medical Complex (KFMMC) in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a retrospective study that analyzed data on inpatient pharmacists' interventions at KFMMC. All inpatient prescriptions from January to December 2022 were involved in the study. Primary data collected from the inpatient pharmacy system include pharmacist intervention type, doctor's action, ward, dosage, medication classification, and whether it falls under high-alert medication. Data was tabulated in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 9594 pharmacy interventions were analyzed. Approximately 1300 (13.6%) of the pharmacist interventions were approved by the physicians. The rate of clinical intervention was 563 (5.9%). More than half of the interventions were from the specialty ward (N=5261; 55.1%). The intervention rate for intravenous dosage was 4837 (50.4%), and 2028 (21.1%) of the medication was considered high alert. The top three most common medication interventions were related to nutrition and blood (N=2268; 23.6%), followed by antimicrobial medications (N=2243; 23.4%) and gastrointestinal medications (N=1731; 18%). Moreover, most of the clinical interventions were related to antimicrobial medicines. No significant relationships were observed between the medication classes and the doctor's action (p=0.087). Conclusion This study highlights the critical role of pharmacist intervention in reducing medication errors. Nutrition and blood medications were most prescribed due to the critical conditions of hospitalized patients, while antimicrobial prescriptions required pharmacist input to optimize therapy and address drug resistance. Pharmacist intervention detected significant errors such as wrong dose, duplication, and frequency, improving patient outcomes and collaboration with physicians, ultimately enhancing healthcare quality at KFMMC. Future research should analyze outpatient pharmacist interventions and strategies for addressing pending interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.