ArticleCureus2025
Time to First Analgesic Administration in the Emergency Department for Adolescents/Young Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) visit the emergency department (ED) for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) pain management. Clinical guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) suggest that patients should receive an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) of 2 and analgesics within 60 minutes of registration. Despite guidelines, SCD patients experience treatment delays. Our objectives are to describe a Mid-Atlantic healthcare system's guideline adherence and examine the effect of time to first analgesic administration (TFAA) on ED disposition. A retrospective cross-sectional study of the electronic health record data set of ED SCD patient encounters from July 2016 to June 2017 was conducted. Descriptive statistics were run for patient characteristics. ED encounters that followed NHLBI guidelines were included in the data set. Independent t-tests were conducted to examine TFAA differences among patients admitted and not admitted. Majority of encounters were classified as ESI 3 (75.6%), and the mean TFAA was 108.9 minutes. Of ED encounters, 23.9% followed ESI guidelines, 21.5% followed TFAA guidelines, and 4.1% followed both NHLBI guidelines. There was a nearly significant difference in mean TFAA among patients discharged from the ED and admitted to the hospital, a mean difference of -24.5 minutes (t=-1.925; p=0.056). Despite existing ED guidelines, SCD patients experience delayed and variable care. Our results show faster TFAA could potentially decrease admission rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.