ArticleCureus2025
The Technique of a Modified Ponte Osteotomy Using Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Spinal Deformity Correction: Does It Save Time and Reduce Blood Loss?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Ultrasonic Osteotome in Segmental Resection and Removal of Cage During Revision Surgery for Intervertebral Disc Space Infection After Lumbar Fusion.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Ultrasonic osteotome versus high-speed burr in channel-assisted cervical key hole technology: a clinical retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Posterior column osteotomies, such as Smith-Petersen and Ponte osteotomies, are widely utilized in the surgical correction of spinal deformities to address sagittal and coronal imbalances by releasing the posterior tension band. While traditional methods using rongeurs and osteotomies are effective, these are often associated with prolonged operative time, significant blood loss, and increased risk to neural structures. These challenges have driven interest in advanced tools like the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS), which uses high-frequency vibrations to enable precise bone cutting with minimal damage to surrounding tissues. This innovative tool has demonstrated significant reductions in blood loss and operative time in various spinal procedures. However, its specific application in modified Ponte osteotomies remains underexplored. This study evaluates the UBS's safety, efficiency, and impact on blood loss in complex deformity corrections and presents a refined technique for optimizing outcomes in these challenging surgeries. Additionally, it outlines a refined technique for executing modified Ponte osteotomies with this advanced tool. Methods This retrospective study included all patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery involving modified Ponte osteotomy with a UBS between January 2013 and June 2022. Key metrics analyzed included the number of modified Ponte osteotomy segments performed per surgery, the total time taken for osteotomies, and the average time required per segment. Blood loss was evaluated with a focus on epidural and bony sources, and methods for controlling bleeding were documented. Safety parameters included intraoperative neurophysiological signal integrity and the incidence of dural tears. Results A total of 695 modified Ponte osteotomy segments were performed in 111 patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgery. The average number of segments created per procedure was 6.26 ± 1.59 (range: three to nine). The mean operative time required for all segments per surgery was 19.16 ± 5.66 minutes, with an average time of 3.05 ± 0.29 minutes per segment (range: 2.13-4.66 minutes). Epidural bleeding was observed at an average of 1.65 ± 1.27 points per surgery (range: 0-6), equating to 0.26 ± 0.20 points per segment. Bleeding was effectively controlled with bipolar ablation and absorbable gelatin sponge packing, and no significant bony bleeding was reported. Of note, there were no instances of intraoperative neuromonitoring signal loss or dural tears, demonstrating the safety of the technique. No splinters occurred while osteotomizing in any case. Conclusions The use of UBS significantly enhances the efficiency and safety of modified Ponte osteotomy during spinal deformity correction surgeries. This technique not only reduces operative time but also minimizes blood loss, offering an advanced approach to achieving precise osteotomies without compromising patient safety. These findings underscore the benefits of incorporating UBS into complex spinal surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.