Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991401›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Technique of a Modified Ponte Osteotomy Using Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Spinal Deformity Correction: Does It Save Time and Reduce Blood Loss?

Ajay Krishnan, Vikrant Chauhan, Sandesh Agarawal, Bharat Dave, Degulmadi Devanand, Mirant B Dave, Shivanand Mayi, Ravi R Rai, Abhijith Anil, Mikeson Panthackel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ajay KrishnanSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Vikrant ChauhanOrthopaedics, Government Doon Medical College and Hospital, Dehradun, IND.
Sandesh AgarawalSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Bharat DaveSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Degulmadi DevanandSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mirant B DaveSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Shivanand MayiSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ravi R RaiSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Abhijith AnilOrthopaedics/Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mikeson PanthackelSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Kishore MurkuteSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Posterior column osteotomies, such as Smith-Petersen and Ponte osteotomies, are widely utilized in the surgical correction of spinal deformities to address sagittal and coronal imbalances by releasing the posterior tension band. While traditional methods using rongeurs and osteotomies are effective, these are often associated with prolonged operative time, significant blood loss, and increased risk to neural structures. These challenges have driven interest in advanced tools like the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS), which uses high-frequency vibrations to enable precise bone cutting with minimal damage to surrounding tissues. This innovative tool has demonstrated significant reductions in blood loss and operative time in various spinal procedures. However, its specific application in modified Ponte osteotomies remains underexplored. This study evaluates the UBS's safety, efficiency, and impact on blood loss in complex deformity corrections and presents a refined technique for optimizing outcomes in these challenging surgeries. Additionally, it outlines a refined technique for executing modified Ponte osteotomies with this advanced tool. Methods This retrospective study included all patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery involving modified Ponte osteotomy with a UBS between January 2013 and June 2022. Key metrics analyzed included the number of modified Ponte osteotomy segments performed per surgery, the total time taken for osteotomies, and the average time required per segment. Blood loss was evaluated with a focus on epidural and bony sources, and methods for controlling bleeding were documented. Safety parameters included intraoperative neurophysiological signal integrity and the incidence of dural tears. Results A total of 695 modified Ponte osteotomy segments were performed in 111 patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgery. The average number of segments created per procedure was 6.26 ± 1.59 (range: three to nine). The mean operative time required for all segments per surgery was 19.16 ± 5.66 minutes, with an average time of 3.05 ± 0.29 minutes per segment (range: 2.13-4.66 minutes). Epidural bleeding was observed at an average of 1.65 ± 1.27 points per surgery (range: 0-6), equating to 0.26 ± 0.20 points per segment. Bleeding was effectively controlled with bipolar ablation and absorbable gelatin sponge packing, and no significant bony bleeding was reported. Of note, there were no instances of intraoperative neuromonitoring signal loss or dural tears, demonstrating the safety of the technique. No splinters occurred while osteotomizing in any case. Conclusions The use of UBS significantly enhances the efficiency and safety of modified Ponte osteotomy during spinal deformity correction surgeries. This technique not only reduces operative time but also minimizes blood loss, offering an advanced approach to achieving precise osteotomies without compromising patient safety. These findings underscore the benefits of incorporating UBS into complex spinal surgical procedures.

Indexed as

blood lossdeformityosteotomypontespineultrasonic bone scalpel

Identifiers

PMID39991401
PMCPMC11845863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.