Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991393›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Challenges of Approaching a Giant Breast Mass: A Case Report With Literature Review.

Sayed Meshal A Ebrahim, Ahmed A Almass, Abdulhamid A Alarbash, Fozan A Aldulaijan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayed Meshal A EbrahimGeneral Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY.
Ahmed A AlmassGeneral Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, SAU.
Abdulhamid A AlarbashGeneral Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, SAU.
Fozan A AldulaijanBreast and Endocrine Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical clinical approach to any breast lesion is through the triple assessment: clinical, radiological, and pathological. However, with giant breast masses, the classical assessment might have limitations in revealing the diagnosis. We report a case of a rapidly growing left breast mass in a 60-year-old woman. In a short period of time, the lesion reached a giant size of 48 cm x 43 cm with mixed constructure and skin changes. The lesion was considered malignant by triple assessment, but the core needle biopsy could not reach a single pathological diagnosis. Giant breast masses are a rare entity of breast lesions that include different benign and malignant diseases. These diseases include malignant forms of breast sarcomas, phyllodes, and leiomyosarcomas, which are aggressive diseases requiring combative management. Diagnosing a giant breast tumor is challenging and demands a high level of suspicion. The classical approach may fail, raising the need for a special approach for such lesions. The adjusted guidelines may involve early multidisciplinary team involvement, advanced imaging, precise biopsy techniques, and earlier neoadjuvant therapy planning.

Indexed as

breast sarcomatoid carcinomagiant breast massleiomyosarcoma of the breastmalignant phyllodes tumortriple assessment

Identifiers

PMID39991393
PMCPMC11844880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.