ArticleCureus2025
Renal Tubular Dysgenesis: Broadening the Discussion of the Etiological Spectrum.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal tubular dysgenesis (RTD) is a rare disorder characterized by impaired development of the renal tubules. It is often a fatal condition that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neonatal kidney failure. RTD can be classified as primary (linked to deleterious variants in genes encoding renin-angiotensin system (RAS) proteins) or secondary to an underlying cause. In this case report, we present a late preterm female neonate born at 35 weeks by elective cesarean section due to oligohydramnios and fetal growth restriction. At birth, she exhibited hypotonia and features consistent with Potter sequence and developed persistent anuric kidney failure, fluid-responsive hypotension, and respiratory distress requiring non-invasive ventilation. Kidney ultrasound revealed no significant abnormalities, leading to a presumptive diagnosis of RTD, which was confirmed by histopathology. Karyotype analysis revealed 46,XX,dup(1)(q24.1q25.1), which was further confirmed by whole exome sequencing. The chromosomal abnormality did not involve RAS genes, and the remaining workup was unremarkable. Despite intensive medical management, the patient died on day 20 of life. The aim of this case report was to raise awareness of this severe kidney disorder, highlighting its atypical presentation, which lacked major cardiovascular dysfunction, showed no identifiable classic etiology despite thorough investigation, and revealed a de novo chromosomal abnormality. These findings suggest the involvement of alternative pathophysiologic mechanisms in RTD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.