ArticleCureus2025
The Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the initial stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has been reported globally. However, the reports on the prognosis of patients with AMI after the initial stage of the pandemic are limited worldwide.
methodsThis retrospective observational study utilized data from the electronic medical records system of the Oita University Hospital. This study encompassed patients who were hospitalized at our hospital for AMI treatment between April 2018 and June 2022. The study period was categorized into the following three periods: the pre-pandemic period (April 2018 to March 2020), the first phase of the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2021), and the second phase of the pandemic (April 2021 to June 2022). The primary outcome was the duration from the initial admission for AMI treatment to the onset of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The secondary outcome was the duration from the initial admission for AMI treatment to death from any cause. These outcomes were compared among patients with AMI admitted during the three periods.
resultsThe one-year MACE-free survival rates did not differ significantly among the three periods (p = 0.146), whereas the one-year overall survival rates were significantly different (p = 0.022). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients with AMI had poorer overall survival in the second phase of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (hazard ratio {HR}: 4.92, 95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.27-19.09, p = 0.021). However, multiple regression analysis did not show significant differences in the overall survival of patients with AMI across the three periods (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.59-12.96, p = 0.196).
conclusionThe long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prognosis of patients with AMI remains unclear. Further research is required to clarify the long-term impact by using larger cohorts that include pre-hospital data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.