Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991380›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Publications Are More Than Lines on Your Curriculum Vitae: An Epistle to Residents (and Faculty).

William C Baumgartner, Michael J Asken, William K Childers

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William C BaumgartnerGeneral Surgery, UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) Harrisburg, Harrisburg, USA.
Michael J AskenInternal Medicine, UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) Harrisburg, Harrisburg, USA.
William K ChildersGeneral Surgery/Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) Harrisburg, Harrisburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical professionals often view writing and publishing as a mere checkbox on a curriculum vitae (CV), yet these activities hold profound value beyond career advancement. This article explores the transformative impact of writing on professional and personal development within the medical field, emphasizing how writing refines critical thinking, fosters creativity, and enhances communication skills. Through the example of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis and parallels from other fields, the article illustrates how writing and publication can influence peers and shape future practices, even without immediate recognition. The article also highlights the evolving role of technology, including conversational AI, in enhancing academic writing and manuscript quality. It underscores the role of writing in patient care, as clear clinical documentation improves patient outcomes by reducing errors and enhancing interdisciplinary communication. Additionally, writing serves as a pathway for discovering hidden talents and interests, as evidenced by the unique career pivot of football coach Andy Reid. This work also highlights the importance of mentorship in guiding novice authors through the rigors of publication and the resilience built through critical feedback. Ultimately, writing contributes far more than CV lines, serving as a powerful catalyst for growth, mastery, and the propagation of innovative ideas within the medical profession.

Indexed as

clinical communicationcritical thinkingmedical writingmentorship in medicineprofessional development

Identifiers

PMID39991380
PMCPMC11846670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.