ArticleCureus2025
Endodermal and Arachnoid Cysts: Lessons From a Challenging Case.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal intradural ventral cysts are rare. This article reports a rare case of the coexistence of arachnoid and endodermal cysts in the cervical spine. A 34-year-old man presented with left upper limb pain and thermal hypoalgesia in the right hand that began four years earlier, progressing to additional pain and numbness in the left arm. He also exhibited weakness in the left extremities and disturbances in fine hand movements. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed two intradural extramedullary cysts at the C3/4 spinal level compressing the spinal cord from the left ventral side. Surgery, involving C3-5 laminoplasty and cyst excision, was performed with an exoscope and endoscope, resulting in improved symptoms and MRI-confirmed cyst removal. Histopathological examination identified the cyst as an arachnoid cyst. However, six months after the operation, his left arm pain recurred, and MRI indicated cyst recurrence. A second surgery with C3-4 corpectomy, cyst removal, and C3-5 anterior cervical fixation was performed. Histopathologically, an endodermal cyst was diagnosed based on epithelial characteristics. Following surgery, the patient's symptoms improved, and the MRI showed no cyst recurrence for three years. This case underscores the diagnostic complexities of distinguishing between arachnoid and endodermal cysts and highlights the importance of adaptable surgical strategies, including posterior and anterior approaches, for the effective management of recurrent ventral cysts. The findings emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care and long-term follow-up to achieve favorable patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.