Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991358›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Successful Management of First-Trimester Uterine Rupture and Placenta Previa: A Case Report.

Yusuke Etori, Ryuhei Nagai, Yuta Shimomoto, Shinpei Yamamoto, Nagamasa Maeda

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yusuke EtoriObstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, JPN.
Ryuhei NagaiObstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, JPN.
Yuta ShimomotoObstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, JPN.
Shinpei YamamotoObstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, JPN.
Nagamasa MaedaObstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 36-year-old woman with five previous cesarean sections presented at 11 weeks of gestation with a 1 cm protruding lesion in the anterior vaginal fornix. Imaging, including MRI, revealed a myometrial defect covered by decidua, suggesting uterine rupture, alongside complete placenta previa. Despite high risks such as hemorrhage, further rupture, miscarriage, and preterm birth, the patient elected to continue her pregnancy under close surveillance. Weekly outpatient follow-up continued until 24 weeks, when transvaginal ultrasound examination showed uterine thinning, prompting hospital admission. A subsequent MRI confirmed the absence of fetal extrusion, and a multidisciplinary team readied for potential emergencies. At 29 weeks, worsening vaginal bleeding necessitated an urgent cesarean section. A 1,456-g male infant was delivered with Apgar scores of 2 at both one and five minutes; the placenta separated easily, and the uterine defect was sutured without incident. Notably, MRI findings ruled out placenta accreta by demonstrating a well-defined decidual layer. The patient's asymptomatic presentation, despite a first-trimester rupture, raises the possibility of a chronic uterine defect existing before pregnancy. This rare case illustrates that even when faced with multiple prior cesarean sections, early uterine rupture, and placenta previa, meticulous imaging and coordinated multidisciplinary management can lead to a viable neonate and preserved maternal health. Further accumulation and review of such cases will help refine clinical guidelines for managing high-risk pregnancies.

Indexed as

definitive diagnosisfirst-trimesterplacenta accreta sequenceplacenta previapreventive interventionsymptomlessuterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID39991358
PMCPMC11845795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.