ReviewCureus2025
Association of Sexual Health and Mental Health in Erectile Dysfunction: Expert Opinion From the Indian Context.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unconsummated marriage: etiology and treatment of erectile dysfunction in newlywed men-a narrative review with a focus on China.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Article
- Restoring sexual health and relationship quality through penile prosthesis implantation.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Erectile Dysfunction: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Contemporary Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Vardenafil in the multidisciplinary management of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review on multidimensional outcomes and clinical integration.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Cost Considerations in Penile Implant Surgery from a Global Perspective.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- From arthritis to erectile dysfunction: potential pathophysiological mechanisms and multidisciplinary integrated management.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Sexual Dysfunction in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review and Call for Multidisciplinary Framework.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The potential link between inflammatory bowel disease and male erectile dysfunction: mechanistic insights and novel therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Help-Seeking Behaviour and Care Delays in Indian Patients Attending a Speciality Sexual Health Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort study.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Is it Erectile Dysfunction or a Mental-Health Challenge? Insights From Psychologists.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition in men, driven by a complex interplay of organic, relational, and psychological factors, necessitating an integrated treatment approach. Psychological factors, such as anxiety, depression, and stress, are significant contributors to erectile problems. Erectile dysfunction can have severe psychological consequences, including feelings of emasculation, humiliation, reduced self-confidence, isolation, loneliness, and a decline in overall well-being. A national advisory board comprising 12 experts from India, including 9 urologists and 3 psychiatrists, convened to discuss a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of ED. Using a modified Delphi method and literature review, the 34 panels developed evidence-based insights. Experts highlighted the importance of thorough assessments of sexual dysfunction in patients. Given the frequent comorbidity of mental health issues with ED, physicians should proactively explore patients' sexual and mental health. Creating a secure and welcoming environment is crucial for these assessments. Physicians should gather detailed information on psychological symptoms, stressors, relationship dynamics, cognitive style, and distractions. Experts highlighted the importance of thorough diagnostic assessments and recommended a multidisciplinary approach integrating pharmacological interventions (e.g., phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors) with psychometric therapy, tailored to the age, existing comorbidities, and underlying causes of ED. A balanced, interdisciplinary approach incorporating psychosexual therapy, lifestyle modifications, and advanced therapies is crucial for the holistic management of ED. Key consensus recommendations also emphasized fostering open communication between patients and healthcare providers, routine mental health screenings in patients with ED, and early referrals to specialists when necessary. Clinicians should actively involve mental health professionals in the management of ED and prioritize individualized treatment strategies tailored to each patient's needs. This multifactorial condition requires coordinated efforts to address both organic and psychogenic causes, restore patients' quality of life, and promote open communication. By proactively engaging with patients, addressing their concerns, and facilitating referrals as needed, clinicians can significantly improve outcomes for patients with ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.