ArticleCureus2025
Diagnostic Efficacy of Sputum Cytology versus Invasive Procedures for Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of post-bronchoscopy sputum cytology in lung cancer diagnosed by bronchoscopy: a retrospective cohort study of 625 patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE AND
aimInterventional diagnostic procedures such as bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle aspiration can lead to significant complications, especially in more vulnerable patients. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with high diagnostic rates via sputum cytology, a non-invasive technique.
methodsThis retrospective, nested case-control study included patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer and who underwent sputum cytology at least once in our tertiary referral hospital between 2012 and 2022.
resultsThere were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, presence of hemoptysis at admission, smoking history/smoking duration, endobronchial localization, clinical stage, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
conclusionOur findings suggest that sputum cytology may have diagnostic efficacy for the adenocarcinoma subtype. Despite the similar clinical stages between the groups, the higher mortality observed in patients diagnosed with lung cancer via sputum cytology may warrant updates in the staging system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.