ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy: Setup, results, and evolution of a new surgical procedure.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Left Ventricular Remodeling After Total Coronary Revascularization via Anterior Thoracotomy Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Revascularization of Left Anterior Descending Artery with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Graft vs. Drug Eluting Stents: A Retrospective, Two-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Within an ERACS Protocol: A Matched Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Partial Upper Ministernotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement Within the Learning Curve Context.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Minimally invasive total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting offers the advantages of total arterial revascularization through an anterolateral minithoracotomy. However, the procedure is technically challenging and associated with a learning curve. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the progress and development of our program over an 8-year period. Methods: We collected prospective data on all patients who underwent procedure at our institution from January 2015 to December 2023. Our program underwent several modifications during this study period, including optimization of surgical exposure using various available instruments, efficient intraoperative time management, utilization of a standard technique for all off-pump coronary artery bypass procedures, and close team member mentoring. Changes in quality control consisted of transitioning from routine postoperative coronary imaging to clinically indicated imaging. The influence of these interventions was assessed by focusing on in-hospital mortality as the primary end point, and operative time and perioperative myocardial infarction as secondary end points, over 2 time periods consisting of patients operated on during the first and second 4-year study period (Group 1, n = 137 and Group 2, n = 142). Results: A total of 279 consecutive patients underwent elective, total arterial minimally invasive total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution over the study period. The mean age of patients was 66 ± 7 years, with 86% being men (n = 241) and 33.1% having diabetes (n = 77). Triple vessel disease was present in 53% of the cohort (n = 123) and left main disease was prevalent in 43% of patients (n = 101). The overall 30-day mortality was 0.4% (n = 1). Compared with the initial 4-year period, the rate of perioperative myocardial infarction decreased 3-fold (4.3% vs 1.4%; Conclusions: Total arterial minimally invasive total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting is a feasible surgical approach that can be performed with very good results, even during the initial learning curve phase. An evolving educational program can provide a smooth transition from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting to minimally invasive total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting, when performed in selected patients in high-volume cardiac centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.