ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Non-invasive pressure-volume loops provide incremental value to age, sex, and infarct size for predicting adverse cardiac remodelling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive pressure-volume loop analysis in left ventricular load manipulation.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of noninvasive pressure-volume loops derived from cardiac magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography in normal subjects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-invasive pressure-volume loops by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- A new hybrid echocardiography and arterial pressure waveform approach for non-invasive reconstruction of the entire left ventricular pressure waveform.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to assess the predictive value of non-invasive pressure-volume (PV) loop variables by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for determining development of adverse remodelling 3 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results: In total, 181 STEMI patients examined with CMR during the index admission (baseline) after primary PCI and at 3-month follow-up in The Third DANish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with STEMI (DANAMI-3) study were retrospectively analysed. A time-varying elastance model for generating PV loops from CMR volumetry and brachial blood pressure was used to calculate contractility, arterial elastance, stroke work, potential energy, efficiency, external power, ventriculoarterial coupling, and energy per ejected volume. Adverse remodelling was seen in 28 patients (15%), defined as a concomitant increase in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume of ≥12% from baseline to follow-up. PV loop variables measured at baseline showed predictive value for adverse remodelling, independent of age, sex, and infarct size (IS) by a logistic regression analysis: contractility [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-12.4] and efficiency (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11). Furthermore, females showed a higher increase in contractility between the timepoints (ΔContractility = 0.4 ± 0.4 mmHg/mL vs. 0.1 ± 0.4 mmHg/mL, Conclusion: Non-invasive PV loop variables by CMR have incremental predictive value to age, sex, and IS for determining development of adverse cardiac remodelling in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Furthermore, the PV loop variables show significant differences in post-infarct cardiovascular adaptation between sexes and culprit vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.