ArticleGlomerular diseases
Double Trouble in the Basement! A Case of PLA2R-Associated Membranous Nephropathy with Atypical Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease.
Article in Glomerular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Concurrent atypical anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease with membranous nephropathy is a rare occurrence. Compared to typical anti-GBM disease, atypical anti-GBM disease is often seronegative, with a mild disease presentation and course. We present a case of concomitant of PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy and atypical anti-GBM disease in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma. Case Presentation: A 66-year-old male with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, and cholangiocarcinoma presented with nephrotic range proteinuria and worsening bilateral lower extremity edema. Urine studies showed 3+ protein and 13 red blood cells per high power field and 24-h urine protein of 14 g (nephrotic range). Serum albumin was 2.1 g/dL and serum creatinine was 0.8 mg/dL (nephrotic syndrome). Serological work-up was negative for antinuclear antibody, anti-double stranded DNA antibody, anti-PLA2R, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, rheumatoid factor, and anti-GBM. Complement (C3 and C4) levels were normal and no monoclonal gammopathy was detected. A kidney biopsy showed membranous nephropathy with typical light microscopic, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopic findings. In addition, there was atypical anti-GBM disease characterized by a non-circumferential cellular crescent in 1 out of 12 glomeruli 2-3+ linear staining for IgG along GBM. There was no tubular basement membrane staining for IgG and albumin staining was negative. The glomeruli demonstrated strong staining for PLA2R but were negative for THSD7A and NELL-1. The patient received rituximab infusion, dapagliflozin, and lisinopril, resulting in remission of proteinuria. Despite intense chemotherapy with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and immunotherapy, the patient's cholangiocarcinoma progressed, and he transitioned to hospice care. Conclusion: For our patient, rituximab resulted in remission of proteinuria. The lack of temporal association with the malignancy is consistent with the biopsy findings of PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy. While there is not an established guideline for atypical anti-GBM disease, our case demonstrates the utility of rituximab for the management of concurrent atypical anti-GBM disease with membranous nephropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.