ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Fractionated reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas: Safety with higher reirradiation dose and larger targets.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal regimen, normal tissue tolerances, and appropriate indications for reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) are uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine whether higher reirradiation dose was associated with toxicity or survival. Methods: Patients with HGG treated with fractionated reirradiation at a single institution from 2007 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Metrics evaluated included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: Two hundred and thirty patients with recurrent HGG were reviewed. Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy with 80.4% receiving concurrent systemic therapy. Median cumulative maximum doses to brainstem and optic structures were 77.9 Gy (range: 4.6-146.0 Gy) and 55.1 Gy (3.3-106.3 Gy), respectively. No injuries to these structures were identified. Radiation necrosis (RN) was identified in 9.4%. There were no significant associations between RN and target size, systemic therapy use, or reirradiation dose. Median OS was 10.2 months from reirradiation start. On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with better KPS, longer interval between radiotherapy sessions, reirradiation at first recurrence, and reirradiation dose ≥ 41.4 Gy. Median OS for those with IDH wildtype glioblastoma was 8.7 months. On multivariate analysis of an IDH wildtype disease subanalysis, improved OS was associated with longer interval between radiotherapy sessions and higher reirradiation dose. Conclusions: These data support the safety and efficacy of fractionated reirradiation for recurrent HGG. They suggest higher reirradiation dose may be feasible, including for large treatment volumes and for tumors near the brainstem or optic structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.