ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2025
Analysis of risk factors for radiation-induced oral mucositis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and prognostic value of EGF and STREM-1.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- L-arginine vs. L-glutamine oral suspensions for radiation-induced oral mucositis: a triple-blind randomized trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study analyzed the risk factors of radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and the correlation between epidermal growth factor (EGF), soluble myeloid cell expression trigger receptor-1 (sTREM-1), and disease severity. Methods: A total of 124 patients with NPC who received radiotherapy from March 2013 to November 2016 were enrolled and divided into the study group (n=68) and the control group (n=56) regarding the presence of RIOM. The risk factors of RIOM were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. According to the severity of RIOM, patients who developed RIOM were divided into mild and severe groups, and the correlation between EGF, sTREM-1 and the severity of RIOM was analyzed by linear regression. According to the 5-year survival of patients after treatment, they were divided into a poor prognosis group (death, recurrence, and distant metastasis) and a better prognosis group and the predictive value of the prognosis of patients was analyzed by the ROC curve. Results: Age (>55 years), smoking, poor oral hygiene, and oral pH<7 were risk factors for RIOM, and the use of oral mucosal protective agents was a protective factor (P<0.05). In patients who developed RIOM, EGF levels decreased with increasing severity of RIOM, and sTREM-1 levels increased (P<0.05). The EGF level of patients was negatively correlated with the severity of RIOM. In addition, EGF levels in the poor prognosis group were lower than those in the better prognosis group, whereas sTREM-1 levels were higher than those in the better prognosis group (P<0.05). The AUC of the combined EGF and sTREM-1 levels test for predicting a patient's prognosis was greater than that of sTREM-1 alone (P<0.05). Conclusions: In short, age (>55 years), smoking, poor oral hygiene, and oral PH<7 are risk factors for RIOM for NPC. The use of oral mucosal protective agents is a protective factor. EGF and sTREM-1 levels are associated with RIOM severity and indicate predictive values for patient outcomes. This study provides new ideas for mitigating the occurrence of RIOM after radiotherapy to treat NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.