Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991117›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

A Phase I/II Study of Ultra-Hypofractionated Carbon-ion Radiation therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.

Noriyuki Okonogi, Hiroshi Tsuji, Kana Kobayashi, Mio Nakajima, Shuri Aoki, Takanobu Utsumi, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Koichiro Akakura, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Hitoshi Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noriyuki OkonogiQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Hiroshi TsujiQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Kana KobayashiQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Mio NakajimaQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Shuri AokiQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
Takanobu UtsumiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi, Chiba 285-8741, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi, Chiba 285-8741, Japan.
Koichiro AkakuraDepartment of Urology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Mishima General Hospital, 2276 Fujikubo, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-0801, Japan.
Tomohiko IchikawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Hitoshi IshikawaQST Hospital, National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We report herein the 3-year results of a phase I/II prospective study of 4-fraction course of carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The present was a single-institution, phase I/II prospective study including patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a 1- or 2-week schedule. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as any genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade 3 or higher within 90 days of beginning CIRT. Ten patients were enrolled in each group, and the CIRT dose was increased in a stepwise manner if there were fewer than 4 cases of DLT. The initial CIRT dose was 36 Gy, followed by 40 Gy or 44 Gy. Low-risk patients did not receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), whereas intermediate-risk patients received 4 to 8 months of neoadjuvant ADT. Results: Between October 2018 and October 2020, 60 patients were enrolled in the present study and completed the treatment regimen. The median post-CIRT follow-up period was 42 months (range, 27-59 months). Of the 60 patients enrolled, 10 were in the low-risk group, and 50 were in the intermediate-risk group. Neither group experienced grade 3 or higher GI or GU adverse events; therefore, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The incidence of grade 2 GU toxicity within 90 days post CIRT was significantly higher in the 44 Gy group than in the 36 to 40 Gy group ( Conclusions: Forty Gy in 4 fractions of CIRT may be appropriate for balancing the therapeutic effects and toxicity. Our findings support further investigations into the efficacy of this strategy.

Identifiers

PMID39991117
PMCPMC11847242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.