Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991113›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Surrounding Lower-Extremity Endoprostheses After Tumor Resection: Causative Microorganisms, Effectiveness of DAIR, and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure.

Philip Sanders, Henk Scheper, Robert van der Wal, Michiel van de Sande, Mark de Boer, Pieter Durk Sander Dijkstra, Michael Bus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip SandersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-4328
Henk ScheperDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-7546
Robert van der WalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-6988
Michiel van de SandeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-7656
Mark de BoerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-6499
Pieter Durk Sander DijkstraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-757X
Michael BusDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-6016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) surrounding an endoprosthesis after reconstruction of a lower extremity following tumor resection is a common complication, and the treatment of these infections is challenging and often requires multiple surgical interventions or even implant removal. Because there has been limited evidence to support treatment strategies and understanding of the epidemiology of the causative microorganisms, we analyzed the effectiveness of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), risk factors for the failure of DAIR, and causative microorganisms in patients with a PJI surrounding a lower-extremity endoprosthesis after tumor resection. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral center for orthopaedic oncology. All patients treated between 2000 and 2018 for PJI surrounding a lower-extremity endoprosthesis after tumor resection were included. Treatment outcomes and risk factors for failure were analyzed in patients primarily treated with DAIR. Causative microorganisms were recorded. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Results: Of the 337 patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction of a lower extremity after tumor resection, 67 patients (20%) developed a PJI surrounding the endoprosthesis. Of those patients, 55 were primarily treated with DAIR. The functional cure rate of DAIR was 65% (36 of 55). A median of 2 debridements per patient was needed. Chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0 to 9.3]) and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of >50 mm/hr at diagnosis (OR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.3 to 15.4]) were associated with treatment failure. Nineteen patients (28%) had a polymicrobial infection. Conclusions: Although sequential procedures are often needed, DAIR has acceptable clinical outcomes and should be considered, dependent on expected survival and the risk factors for treatment failure noted in this study. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID39991113
PMCPMC11841843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.