ArticleJB & JS open access
The Effects of Antibiotic-Impregnated Spacers on Bone Healing in an Animal Model of the Induced Membrane Technique: Healing of a Critical-Size Femoral Defect in a Rat Model.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgeons performing the induced membrane technique (IMT) often incorporate antibiotics into the spacer at the first stage of the surgical procedure to prevent or treat infection. However, the effect of antibiotic use on subsequent bone healing is not clear. This study aimed to investigate if antibiotic-impregnated spacers impact subsequent bone healing in a rat model of the IMT. Methods: Inbred male rats (Fischer 344) were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the antibiotic dose in the spacer: (1) control (no antibiotics), (2) low-dose (1.2 g tobramycin and 1.0 g vancomycin per 40 g of polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA]), and (3) high-dose (3.6 g tobramycin and 3.0 g vancomycin per 40 g of PMMA). We created a 5-mm segmental defect in the right femoral diaphysis. The bone was stabilized with a plate and screws, and the assigned spacer was inserted into the defect. Four weeks later, the spacer was removed and bone graft was placed within the defect. Radiographs made 12 weeks after grafting were scored according to union status and degree of bone healing. Micro-computed tomographic (CT) analysis and biomechanical testing were also performed at 12 weeks. Results: Full radiographic union was achieved in 10 (83%) of 12 control animals, 13 (100%) of 13 low-dose animals, and 8 (62%) of 13 high-dose animals (high-dose compared with low-dose: risk ratio, 11.0; p = 0.039). The control group demonstrated higher bone volume compared with the high-dose group (mean difference, 9.0 mm Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that low doses of antibiotics in PMMA spacers used for the IMT did not impair bone healing. However, high doses of antibiotics demonstrated inferior bone healing. Clinical Relevance: The addition of high-dose antibiotics to the PMMA spacers used for the IMT may result in impaired bone healing and should be used with caution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.