ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025
Combining Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking and Experimental Validation to Explore the Effects and Mechanisms of Indirubin on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Investigating the Mechanisms ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Exploration of the effect and mechanism of indirubin on infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus based on network pharmacology.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Synthetic progress and anti-leukemic research on indirubin analogues: a review since 2010.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Hydroxysafflor Yellow A modulation of metabolite networks and inhibition of JAK2/STAT1 pathway in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Molecular Mechanism of 1,25(OH)Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Exploring chamazulene as a novel therapeutic agent for breast cancerFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of indirubin in treating ALL using network pharmacology and experimental validation. Methods: Potential targets of indirubin- and ALL-related genes were identified using public databases. Core genes were filtered through protein-protein interaction analysis in Cytoscape. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted to explore the potential mechanisms of indirubin against ALL. Drug-disease-functional annotation-signaling pathway network maps were constructed. Molecular docking between indirubin and core proteins was performed using AutoDock Vina software. Finally, both in vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to validate these findings. Results: PPI network analysis identified eight potential core targets of indirubin in ALL: AKT1, CASP3, and the mammalian target of rapamycin. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses suggested that the mechanism of action of indirubin against ALL involves multiple biological functions and signaling pathways, with the PI3K-AKT pathway likely playing a central role. Molecular docking findings further confirmed the strong binding affinity of indirubin for the core targets. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that indirubin inhibited ALL cell proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis; the underlying mechanism may involve the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Conclusion: The action and mechanism of indirubin in ALL through network pharmacology, as well as in vivo and in vitro experimental validation were elucidated, offering new insights and potential therapeutic avenues for the treatment of ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.