Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991057›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Comparison of the safety of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xianchun Liu, Longyi Zhang, Li Zhao, Xuelei Zhou, Wei Mao, Linlin Chen, Hongyu Zhu, Ying Xie, Linji Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Remimazolam in anesthesia and sedation: A narrative review.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Sedation in endoscopy: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xianchun Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Longyi Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Li ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xuelei ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Wei MaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Linlin ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Hongyu ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Ying XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Linji LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam is a novel sedative drug approved for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Clinical trials have already explored its use in elderly patients for general anesthesia. For elderly patients with declining physical and physiological function, anesthesia safety is crucial. Most current clinical studies compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol, though the results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the safety of remimazolam and propofol in general anesthesia for elderly patients. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for all published randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol for general anesthesia in elderly patients. We synthesized data from eligible studies using relative risk or mean difference, and analyzed differences in hemodynamic stability and adverse effects between the two drugs. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two researchers. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials involving 571 participants were included. Compared to propofol, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.81], Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, compared to propofol, remimazolam reduced the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and injection site pain during general anesthesia in elderly patients. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were more stable after induction. Remimazolam may be a safer sedative for elderly patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024516950, CRD42024516950.

Indexed as

elderly patientsgeneral anesthesiameta-analysispropofolremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID39991057
PMCPMC11842237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.