Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991044›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2025

Processes of development related with the implementation of the Icelandic prevention model in a rural Canadian community.

Tanya Halsall, Kianna Mahmoud, Matt Drabenstott, Heather Orpana, Srividya N Iyer, Alfgeir Kristjansson, Kimberly Matheson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanya HalsallUniversity of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at The Royal, 1145 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5791-0986
Kianna MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5849 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2 Canada.
Matt DrabenstottStudents Commission of Canada, 23 Isabella St, Toronto, ON M4Y Canada.
Heather OrpanaPublic Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, A.L. 6501H, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9 Canada.
Srividya N IyerDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Av. Des Pins, Montréal, QC H3A 1A1 Canada.
Alfgeir KristjanssonSchool of Public Health and West Virginia Prevention Research Center, RC Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA.
Kimberly MathesonUniversity of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at The Royal, 1145 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) is a sequential 10-step community-driven collaborative intervention that is designed to support the prevention of substance use in youth by establishing healthy developmental contexts. The IPM has been implemented across Iceland for over 20 years and is now being implemented in other countries. Recognizing the need to explore how to adapt the IPM to new contexts and document the implementation of the model, this paper describes a process evaluation of the first three steps of the IPM within a Canadian rural community to capture experiences during the early development. Specifically, this study addresses the following research questions: (1) What are the processes of development and contextual features that influence the implementation of the IPM within Lanark County, Ontario? and (2) What adaptations are needed to successfully implement the IPM in Canada? Semi-structured interviews were conducted to examine experiences and lessons learned through the implementation of the model. Thematic analyses were completed using QSR NVivo. A deductive and inductive approach was applied, whereby some interview guide questions were derived from the IPM implementation steps and others were more exploratory, examining context and processes of development. Nine interviews were conducted with key partners who were leading the implementation of the IPM. Themes highlighting cultural factors that influence implementation, processes of development related to community engagement, and themes relating to youth participation, fidelity issues, fundraising, health equity and challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic were identified. This paper contributes new scientific knowledge related to implementation processes within upstream prevention of substance use and practical information that is useful for communities interested in implementing the IPM.

Indexed as

COVIDHealth equityProcess evaluationSubstance use preventionYouth

Identifiers

PMID39991044
PMCPMC11842429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.