Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991035›Full record

ReviewACS measurement science au2025

Sample Preparation Approaches for Determination of Quinolones in Aqueous Matrixes: Systematic Review.

Tainara Aparecida Nunes Ribeiro, Daiane Dulcileia Moraes de Paula, Marcella Matos Cordeiro Borges, Leandro Augusto Calixto, Keyller Bastos Borges

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS measurement science au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tainara Aparecida Nunes RibeiroInstituto de Física e Química, Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI), Av. BPS, 1303, Pinheirinho, 37500-903 Itajubá, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0589-8513
Daiane Dulcileia Moraes de PaulaDepartamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio 74, Fábricas, 36301-160 São João del-Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcella Matos Cordeiro BorgesDepartamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio 74, Fábricas, 36301-160 São João del-Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9578-3628
Leandro Augusto CalixtoDepartamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Campus Diadema, Prof. Artur Riedel, 275, Eldorado, 09972-270 Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil.
Keyller Bastos BorgesDepartamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Campus Dom Bosco, Praça Dom Helvécio 74, Fábricas, 36301-160 São João del-Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1067-1919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quinolones and fluoroquinolones are among the most used antibiotics worldwide. Antibiotic resistance genes can be acquired by human pathogens from ambient microorganisms, which can lead to a treatment failure for bacterial infections. Furthermore, determining the levels of quinolones and fluoroquinolones in aqueous matrixes is crucial for safeguarding both human health and the environment. Using sample preparation techniques is essential since these compounds are commonly present in aqueous matrixes at trace levels. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the main analytical methods for the determination of quinolones in aqueous samples based on a systematic literature review. We only considered studies that presented more robust analytical techniques that allowed for more accurate and precise measurement of quinolones/fluoroquinolones in aqueous matrixes. In total, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and were used in our analysis. A total of 21 quinolone antibacterial agents were investigated in water samples from 13 countries, showing a potential risk around the world. Ciprofloxacin (72.2%), enrofloxacin (61.1%), norfloxacin (50%), marbofloxacin, and levofloxacin (33.3%) were the most frequently evaluated compounds. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography stands out as the predominant instrumental technique for the separation and identification of these compounds. Additionally, among the selected studies in this review, 44% employed liquid-liquid extraction techniques and its miniaturized versions, while 56% opted for solid-phase extraction and its miniaturized variations. Finally, it is important to note that the final method efficiency relies on the entire process, from selecting the instrumental technique with appropriate detection limits, going through the entire sample preparation, to achieving a good recovery through adjustments in the extraction parameters to archive the determination of trace levels.

Identifiers

PMID39991035
PMCPMC11843513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.