ArticleKidney international reports2025
Implementation of a Kidney Genetic Service Into the Diagnostic Pathway for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Canada.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scoping Review of Global Kidney Genetics Clinic Models and Outcomes.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- The Importance of Molecular Testing in the Diagnosis of Genetic Syndromes with Chronic Kidney Disease: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic sequencing technologies for rare disease in mainstream healthcare: the current state of implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Article
- Framework for standardized genetic testing recommendations for chronic kidney disease in Ontario.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genetic kidney disease (GKD) accounts for 10% to 20% of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Genetic testing using gene panel or targeted exome sequencing (ES) can confirm GKD; however, integration into clinical practice has been hampered by small studies, selective populations, and data predominately derived from research settings. Using prespecified clinical referral criteria and a diagnostic pipeline, we performed a prospective cohort study describing diagnostic efficacy and clinical utility of genetic assessment in patients with CKD. Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of 300 participants (256 families) referred to a kidney genetics clinic, between March 2020 and March 2024. Testing strategies included gene panels, and if negative or unsuitable, targeted ES analysis. Testing was performed for the detection of variants in genes known to cause CKD. Results: We identified a causative variant in 33% of families (85/256). Diagnostic yield increased from 23% ( Conclusion: Instituting referral guidelines and a standardized testing algorithm established a genetic diagnosis in one-third of participants, providing insight into the viability of integrating genetic assessment in the CKD diagnostic pathway. Considering the potential for clinical utility, strategies to reduce the time from CKD diagnosis to genetics assessment are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.