ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025
Therapeutic Drug Distribution across the Mouse Brain Is Heterogeneous as Revealed by In Vivo, Spatially Resolved Aptamer-Based Sensing.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HDAC3 Inhibitor RGFP966 Enhances Memory Persistence in a Biphasic Manner and Modulates NF-kB Nuclear Localization.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- In Vivo Electrochemical Monitoring of Safinamide Pharmacokinetics in the Brain Explores Its Correlation With Vision-Related Neuronal Activity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Multicompartment Drug Monitoring Reveals Paired Brain-Liver Kinetics and Selective Central Nervous System Barrier Permeability in Rats.ACS sensors · 2026Article
- Cyclooctyne-Functionalized N-Heterocyclic Carbenes for Click Coupling of Sensing Oligonucleotides to Gold Surfaces.ACS sensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug discovery for central nervous system (CNS) targets is a high stakes process with estimated success rates below ten percent. Dose scaling, penetration through the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), and potency are among the various challenges involved in developing drugs for CNS targets. The standard approach to evaluate some of these parameters is dosing lead therapeutic compounds via intravenous delivery and assessing their brain levels via tissue homogenization and ex vivo quantification. Although a cost and time effective approach, brain homogenization lacks pharmacokinetic spatial resolution and normalizes drug levels to the entire brain volume. The brain, however, is known to have regional differences in cellular composition, transporters, BBB permeability, and drug-metabolizing enzymes, factors that could significantly affect pharmacological assessments during drug discovery. In this study we employ electrochemical aptamer-based sensors, a technology that allows in situ, real-time molecular monitoring in live animals, to reveal significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of drug uptake and accumulation in the brain of mice. Using vancomycin in the context of penetrating brain injury (PBI), our results highlight that potency may be significantly affected by PBI location. Additionally, more accurate dose scaling and delivery for deep brain wounds could be achieved by adjusting route of administration based on real-time-measured pharmacokinetic profiles, for example by changing delivery from intravenous to intracerebroventricular dosing. We emphasize the issue of establishing accurate pharmacological parameters during preclinical drug discovery efforts and underline the value of aptamer-based sensors for precise estimations of drug pharmacokinetics, transport across the BBB, and effective dose delivery during preclinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.