Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990859›Full record

ArticlePatient related outcome measures2025

Psychometric Validation of Patient Satisfaction Assessment Tool for Alternative Medicine Healthcare Facility in India.

Divya Taneja, Renu Mittal, Shashank Atrey, Nitu Barod, Shweta Singh, Niharika Jain, Roshni, Subhash Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient related outcome measures, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Divya Taneja *Public Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-6576
Renu Mittal *Public Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.
Shashank AtreyPublic Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.
Nitu BarodPublic Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.
Shweta SinghPublic Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.
Niharika JainHospital Wing, DR. B. R. Sur Homoeopathic Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Delhi, India.
RoshniPublic Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.
Subhash KaushikPublic Health Coordination, Headquarters, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Good health status has traditionally been linked to greater levels of patient satisfaction. With the emergence and integration of various medical modalities, including Homeopathy, Ayurveda, and other complementary and alternative medical treatments, patients are likely to have different satisfaction levels during their interaction with different practitioners. Amidst this diversity, the efficacy, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of these treatment approaches have garnered significant attention. Hence, a tool was developed to assess the patient's interaction with Complementary and Alternative Medicine treatments specifically Homeopathy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Patient Satisfaction Assessment Tool (PSAT) developed to assess patient interaction with homeopathic outreach services. Methods: A new structured questionnaire was developed using a standardized procedure. After obtaining clearance from the scientific and ethics committee of the Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, data was collected from consenting participants above 18 years of age attending the Dr. D.P. Rastogi Central Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. Data was then computerized and analyzed by principal component analysis as the extraction method and orthogonal varimax as the rotation method. Results: A total of 285 participants were enrolled for psychometric validation, and 254 participants were included in the final analyses after exclusion. The mean (±Standard Deviation) age of participants was 37.63 (±12.9) years (range 18-79). The final 34-item questionnaire was arranged into nine domains as per rotated component matrix analysis. The overall internal consistency of the final questionnaire, as calculated by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.79, and the measure of sampling adequacy was 0.85 (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test). Conclusion: Initial results from the pilot tests suggest that Patient Satisfaction Assessment Tool (PSAT) is effective in capturing key aspects of patient satisfaction, from homeopathic clinical services which can guide future quality improvement initiatives in alternative medicine healthcare facilities.

Indexed as

consultation qualityhealth consciousnesshomeopathyoutpatient departmenttreatment quality

Identifiers

PMID39990859
PMCPMC11847423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.