ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2024
[Movable Array of Magnetoencephalography With Optically Pumped Magnetometers Effectively Captures Primary Auditory-Evoked Response Signals in Healthy Populations at Low Altitudes].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a movable (with the distance between the temporal scalp and the detector being adjustable) array of optically pumped magnetometers for magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) in capturing auditory evoked response signals in healthy subjects living at low altitudes, and to provide a useful technical reference for subsequent exploration of the changes in brain functions in populations living at high altitudes on a long-term basis. Methods: Forty healthy subjects living at a low altitude (470 m above sea level) were recruited. The distance between the scalp and the bilateral temporal lobe detector was adjusted, and the subjects' auditory responses in the temporal lobes were recorded at the distances of 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm. For the different distances, the M100 peak signal strength, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and latency were analyzed along with the corresponding auditory source localization maps. A single-factor analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in response signals at varying distances. Results: As the distance between the scalp and the detector increased, the noise, the signal, and the SNR gradually weakened ( Conclusion: When the distance between the detector and the scalp is 5 mm, the SNR value is the highest, resulting in high sensitivity and high signal strength. On the other hand, even when the distance between the detector and the scalp reaches 15 mm, the SNR of the OPM-MEG is still higher than 16 dB, which meets the clinical signal acquisition requirements. Furthermore, the auditory stimulus source reconstruction results were generally consistent. Changing the scalp-to-detector distance does not affect the applicability of the source localization results, validating the device's effectiveness in signal acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.