Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990840›Full record

ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2024

[Basic Research on the Microstructure of Rat Bones in the High-Altitude Environment of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau].

Sisi Zhao, Zhetao Wang, Hongke Yin, Chunhua Wang, Jinghang Suo, Boshen Liang, Lei Wang, Fabao Gao

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Preventive Regulation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation by α-Zearalenol Ameliorates Bone Loss in Osteoporotic Rats].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sisi Zhao( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhetao Wang( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Hongke Yin( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Chunhua Wang( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jinghang Suo( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Boshen Liang( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lei Wang( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Fabao Gao( 610041) Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To establish a hypobaric hypoxia rat model in a real high-altitude environment, to investigate the effects of the real high-altitude environment on rat bone mass and bone microstructure using multiple methods such as Micro CT, blood biochemistry, and pathology, and to explore the potential mechanisms involved. Methods: Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were transported to the Yushu Plateau Laboratory (at 4250 m above sea level) in Qinghai Province and kept there for 4, or 8, or 18 months. These groups were designated as H-4, H-8, and H-18, respectively. Upon completion of the high-altitude exposure, these animals were transported to the Molecular Imaging Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (at 500 m above sea level) in Chengdu for relevant testing and comparison with the control animals raised in a low-altitude environment for the same durations (designated L-4, L-8, and L-18). The tests performed included blood biochemistry, Micro CT imaging, and pathological assessments such as ELISA, Western blot, and HE and TRAP staining. Results: Compared with that of the control group, the body mass of rats in the H-4 and H-18 groups decreased significantly (H-4 group vs. L-4 group: [513.75±35.10] g vs. [649.18±60.03] g, Conclusion: The impact of high-altitude environment on rat femurs is characterized primarily by a reduction in trabecular bone mass and damage to bone microstructure.

Indexed as

AltitudeAltitude SicknessBone and BonesHypoxiaAnimalsBone DensityChinaMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTibetBone metabolismBone microstructureHypobaric hypoxiaMicro CT

Identifiers

PMID39990840
PMCPMC11839369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.