ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2024
[Identification of Differences in Brain Functions at Varied Degrees of Acclimatization to High Altitudes Based on Resting-State Electroencephalogram Signals].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High serum uric acid levels explains the negative impact of the altitude adaptation index on the brain electroencephalographic Microstate D under high-altitude hypoxic conditions.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the differences in brain functions between individuals with good acclimatization to high altitudes and those with poor acclimatization based on microstate and functional connectivity analysis of resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) activities. Methods: A total of 44 residents exposed to the high-altitude environment of 3650 m above sea level were enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to their findings for the high-altitude acclimatization index (AAI), with 22 in the good acclimatization group and 22 in the poor acclimatization group. The good acclimatization group had 10 males and 12 females of the mean age of (20.48±2.09) years. Among them, 10 were Tibetans, and 12 were Han Chinese. The poor acclimatization group consisted of 18 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (18.90±1.25) years. Among them, 7 were Tibetans, and 15 were Han Chinese. The K-means clustering algorithm was used to classify EEG microstates into four categories of A, B, C, and D. The average duration, coverage, occurrence frequency, and transition probabilities between microstates were compared. Coherence analysis (COH) was performed to assess the strength of brain network connectivity. Results: Compared to the good acclimatization group, the poor acclimatization group exhibited a longer duration, higher occurrence frequency, and coverage of microstate C. The coverage of microstate D was also higher, while the occurrence frequency and coverage of microstate B were lower. The poor acclimatization group showed a decrease in transitions from microstate B to A or D, while transitions from C to B or D, and those from D to A or C increased, showing statistically significant differences between the groups ( Conclusion: The good and poor high-altitude acclimatization groups exhibit different neural mechanisms in terms of microstates and functional connectivity. There are significant differences between individuals with good acclimatization and those with poor acclimatization regarding visual information processing, interference resistance, brain network stability, and coherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.