ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
A Systematic Study on Digital Light Processing 3D Printing of 0-3 Ceramic Composites for Piezoelectric Metastructures.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Untethered Ring-Shaped Miniature Robot with Axisymmetric Vibrations and Non-axisymmetrically Arranged Feet.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Interlayer Bonding in DLP-Printed Piezoelectric Ceramics via Controlled Secondary Curing for High Piezoelectric Performance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Liquid-Liquid Interface Polar Engineering for Organic Piezoelectrics.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital light processing (DLP) is a high-speed, high-precision 3-dimensional (3D) printing technique gaining traction in the fabrication of ceramic composites. However, when printing 0-3 composites containing lead zirconate titanate (PZT) particles, a widely used piezoelectric ceramic, severe density and refractive index mismatches between the 2 phases pose challenges for ink synthesis and the printing process. Here, we systematically and quantitatively optimized DLP printing of PZT composites, streamlining process development and providing a solid theoretical and experimental foundation for broader applications of DLP technology. PZT particles were pretreated with air plasma to improve slurry uniformity and enhance stress transfer at the composite interface, leading to improved chemical modification, mechanical strength, and piezoelectric properties. We investigated the effects of key process parameters on printability and accuracy by analyzing the curing behavior of PZT-polymer composites. A quantitative model of the DLP curing process was introduced. Unlike stereolithography (SLA), DLP curing depth was found to depend on energy dose and light intensity, with higher intensities proving more favorable for printing 0-3 PZT composites. From depth/width-energy curves, optimal process parameters were determined. We designed and fabricated a soft piezoelectric metamaterial-based touch sensor using these parameters, achieving a customized output profile. This work offers critical insights into optimizing DLP for functional materials and expands the potential of 3D-printed piezoelectric composites.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.