Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39990747›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Intermediate Vision Following Monofocal IOL Implantation.

Smita Agarwal, Erin Thornell, Sara Nadege Frye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Smita AgarwalWollongong Eye Specialists, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-8311-3017
Erin ThornellWollongong Eye Specialists, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Sara Nadege FryeClinical Development & Medical Affairs, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: While providing exceptional distance visual outcomes, intermediate vision achieved with monofocal IOLs has not been thoroughly investigated. Patients and Methods: A total of 63 eyes from 52 patients (average age 73.48±6.8 years, 56% female) were included for analysis following implantation of the Clareon and Clareon Toric monofocal intraocular IOL with AutonoMe (CNA0T0 or CNA0T2-T6) for the treatment of cataract or refractive error. Visual and refractive outcomes including uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuity, manifest refraction and defocus were first assessed at 4-6 weeks and then again at 12 weeks following surgery. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of the IOLSAT questionnaire and subjective visual quality was assessed using a modified version of the QUVID questionnaire. Results: Average postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.17±0.40 D, with 82% and 96% of eyes achieving within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D of the refractive SE target, respectively. Average monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) were 0.03±0.10 and 0.35±0.13 LogMAR. Postoperative UIVA improved with more myopic SE (P < 0.0001) and spherical refractive error (P < 0.0001). Bilaterally implanted patients had higher spectacle independence for intermediate tasks compared to unilateral patients (51.1% versus 31.2% respectively). Conclusion: The Clareon monofocal IOL provided excellent distance vision with a majority of patients achieving spectacle independence for intermediate tasks. While the IOL likely contributed to these visual outcomes, surgeons can also adjust refractive targets to help achieve better intermediate vision postoperatively.

Indexed as

Clareonintermediate visual acuitymonofocal IOLspectacle Independencevisual performance

Identifiers

PMID39990747
PMCPMC11847419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.