ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Intermediate Vision Following Monofocal IOL Implantation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes on pseudophakic mini-monovision with monofocal intraocular lens on intermediate vision with immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Intermediate Visual Performance of Clareon Versus Eyhance Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Visual performance and patient-reported outcomes of a non-apodized diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in Chinese cataract patients: a prospective multicenter real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Modern Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Incorporating HEMA: Three-Month Refractive and Visual Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: While providing exceptional distance visual outcomes, intermediate vision achieved with monofocal IOLs has not been thoroughly investigated. Patients and Methods: A total of 63 eyes from 52 patients (average age 73.48±6.8 years, 56% female) were included for analysis following implantation of the Clareon and Clareon Toric monofocal intraocular IOL with AutonoMe (CNA0T0 or CNA0T2-T6) for the treatment of cataract or refractive error. Visual and refractive outcomes including uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuity, manifest refraction and defocus were first assessed at 4-6 weeks and then again at 12 weeks following surgery. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of the IOLSAT questionnaire and subjective visual quality was assessed using a modified version of the QUVID questionnaire. Results: Average postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.17±0.40 D, with 82% and 96% of eyes achieving within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D of the refractive SE target, respectively. Average monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) were 0.03±0.10 and 0.35±0.13 LogMAR. Postoperative UIVA improved with more myopic SE (P < 0.0001) and spherical refractive error (P < 0.0001). Bilaterally implanted patients had higher spectacle independence for intermediate tasks compared to unilateral patients (51.1% versus 31.2% respectively). Conclusion: The Clareon monofocal IOL provided excellent distance vision with a majority of patients achieving spectacle independence for intermediate tasks. While the IOL likely contributed to these visual outcomes, surgeons can also adjust refractive targets to help achieve better intermediate vision postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.