ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
PH-LLM: Public Health Large Language Models for Infoveillance.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An equity-aware generative AI copilot for digital public health surveillance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of public health intervention, such as vaccination and social distancing, relies on public support and adherence. Social media has emerged as a critical platform for understanding and fostering public engagement with health interventions. However, the lack of real-time surveillance on public health issues leveraging social media data, particularly during public health emergencies, leads to delayed responses and suboptimal policy adjustments. Methods: To address this gap, we developed PH-LLM (Public Health Large Language Models for Infoveillance)-a novel suite of large language models (LLMs) specifically designed for real-time public health monitoring. We curated a multilingual training corpus comprising 593,100 instruction-output pairs from 36 datasets, covering 96 public health infoveillance tasks and 6 question-answering datasets based on social media data. PH-LLM was trained using quantized low-rank adapters (QLoRA) and LoRA plus, leveraging Qwen 2.5, which supports 29 languages. The PH-LLM suite includes models of six different sizes: 0.5B, 1.5B, 3B, 7B, 14B, and 32B. To evaluate PH-LLM, we constructed a benchmark comprising 19 English and 20 multilingual public health tasks using 10 social media datasets (totaling 52,158 unseen instruction-output pairs). We compared PH-LLM's performance against leading open-source models, including Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Mistral-Large-Instruct-2407, and Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, as well as proprietary models such as GPT-4o. Findings: Across 19 English and 20 multilingual evaluation tasks, PH-LLM consistently outperformed baseline models of similar and larger sizes, including instruction-tuned versions of Qwen2.5, Llama3.1/3.2, Mistral, and bloomz, with PH-LLM-32B achieving the state-of-the-art results. Notably, PH-LLM-14B and PH-LLM-32B surpassed Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Mistral-Large-Instruct-2407, and GPT-4o in both English tasks (>=56.0% vs. <=52.3%) and multilingual tasks (>=59.6% vs. <= 59.1%). The only exception was PH-LLM-7B, with slightly suboptimal average performance (48.7%) in English tasks compared to Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (50.7%), although it outperformed GPT-4o mini (46.9%), Mistral-Small-Instruct-2409 (45.8%), Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (45.4%), and bloomz-7b1-mt (27.9%). Interpretation: PH-LLM represents a significant advancement in real-time public health infoveillance, offering state-of-the-art multilingual capabilities and cost-effective solutions for monitoring public sentiment on health issues. By equipping global, national, and local public health agencies with timely insights from social media data, PH-LLM has the potential to enhance rapid response strategies, improve policy-making, and strengthen public health communication during crises and beyond. Funding: This study is supported in part by NIH grants R01LM013337 (YL).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.