ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Prompts to Table: Specification and Iterative Refinement for Clinical Information Extraction with Large Language Models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracting structured data from free-text medical records at scale is laborious, and traditional approaches struggle in complex clinical domains. We present a novel, end-to-end pipeline leveraging large language models (LLMs) for highly accurate information extraction and normalization from unstructured pathology reports, focusing initially on kidney tumors. Our innovation combines flexible prompt templates, the direct production of analysis-ready tabular data, and a rigorous, human-in-the-loop iterative refinement process guided by a comprehensive error ontology. Applying the finalized pipeline to 2,297 kidney tumor reports with pre-existing templated data available for validation yielded a macro-averaged F1 of 0.99 for six kidney tumor subtypes and 0.97 for detecting kidney metastasis. We further demonstrate flexibility with multiple LLM backbones and adaptability to new domains utilizing publicly available breast and prostate cancer reports. Beyond performance metrics or pipeline specifics, we emphasize the critical importance of task definition, interdisciplinary collaboration, and complexity management in LLM-based clinical workflows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.