ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Probing Large Language Model Hidden States for Adverse Drug Reaction Knowledge.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) integrate knowledge from diverse sources into a single set of internal weights. However, these representations are difficult to interpret, complicating our understanding of the models' learning capabilities. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) linearize LLM embeddings, creating monosemantic features that both provide insight into the model's comprehension and simplify downstream machine learning tasks. These features are especially important in biomedical applications where explainability is critical. Here, we evaluate the use of Gemma Scope SAEs to identify how LLMs store known facts involving adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We transform hidden-state embeddings of drug names from Gemma2-9b-it into interpretable features and train a linear classifier on these features to classify ADR likelihood, evaluating against an established benchmark. These embeddings provide strong predictive performance, giving AUC-ROC of 0.957 for identifying acute kidney injury, 0.902 for acute liver injury, 0.954 for acute myocardial infarction, and 0.963 for gastrointestinal bleeds. Notably, there are no significant differences (p > 0.05) in performance between the simple linear classifiers built on SAE outputs and neural networks trained on the raw embeddings, suggesting that the information lost in reconstruction is minimal. This finding suggests that SAE-derived representations retain the essential information from the LLM while reducing model complexity, paving the way for more transparent, compute-efficient strategies. We believe that this approach can help synthesize the biomedical knowledge our models learn in training and be used for downstream applications, such as expanding reference sets for pharmacovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.