ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Assessing the diagnostic potential of 16SrRNA gene for neonatal sepsis: A tertiary care hospital study in South India.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The need of the hour is to incorporate a rapid assay that could efficiently detect neonatal sepsis. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of 16SrRNA broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in neonatal sepsis. Methods: The demographic and clinical details of 100 neonates clinically suspected to have sepsis were collected adopting pretested clinical proforma, followed by baseline laboratory investigations, including blood culture, complete blood counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Around, 0.2-0.3 ml of the EDTA blood was subjected to enrichment followed by DNA isolation using the modified spin column method. Based on the blood culture report, neonates were further divided into the suspected sepsis group (n = 50) and the confirmed sepsis group (n = 50). We performed 16SrRNA broad-range PCR to identify the presence of bacteria, and the results were analyzed statistically using SPSS software. Results: Neonates in both groups were found to have clinical parameters comparable to each other except for birth weight, length, and head circumference, which was found to be lower in the culture-positive group than in culture-negative group (p < 0.05). The diagnosis of neonatal sepsis by 16SrRNA broad-range PCR compared to blood culture revealed 100% sensitivity, 64% specificity, and 73.5% positive and 100% negative predictive value. The 18 cases detected positive by PCR had clinical and other diagnostic findings consistent with sepsis. Conclusion: The 16SrRNA broad-range PCR effectively ruled out sepsis in 32 neonates within 8 h of sample collection compared to blood culture, which took 24 h. The method may not replace blood culture but can be used to complement it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.